Legal Opinion
Evanston Insurance Company v. Murphy
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 31, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04954Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Evanston Insurance Company, No. CV-19-04954-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Tracey Portee Murphy, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter arises from the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum under Federal Rule 16 of Civil Procedure 45. Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Evanston Insurance Company 17 (“Evanston”) asks the Court to compel production of documents subpoenaed from 18 investigator Keith Tolhurst and Tolhurst International, LLC (“Tolhurst”). (Doc. 69.) 19 Defendants/Counterclaimants Tracee Portee…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.