Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Masters

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1976No. 8047PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REDMANN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, after posting a $750 cash appeal bond, filed a rule in this court to obtain some relief from a $652.50 transcript cost which he says he is unable to pay. His rule raises the issue of “jurisdiction,” La.C.C.P. 2088, of trial and appellate courts after the appeal bond is filed. Concluding that jurisdiction lies with the trial court, we dismiss.

Appellant seeks to reduce his bond to $200, freeing $550 towards payment of transcript. Appellant has need for some protection: it has been held that the clerk has no authority to apply the cash bond to cost payment,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ThibodauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Case v. CaseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Malveaux v. BullerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Madere v. CreelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Kliebert v. KliebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alombro v. Campbell "66" Express, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Parker v. Chimneywood Homeowners' Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API