Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Thibodaux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 4, 1935No. 33157PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff sued to establish the boundary line between his land and the lands of the defendants. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants obtained an order for a devolutive appeal to the Court of Appeal for the First circuit, without giving an appeal bond; that is to say, in forma pauperis. The petition for the appeal was accompanied by affidavits (as required by section 2 of Act No. 156 of 1912) to the effect that the appellants were so poor that they were unable to pay the court costs or to give an appeal bond, or bond for costs. The petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. Garlick v. DalbeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  3. Succession of WolfeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. Buckley v. ThibodeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. Oldham v. HooverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Alengi v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. Brewer v. ThoeleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. Ross v. HatchetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API