Legal Opinion
Archuleta v. Grand Lodge Etc. of MacHinists
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1968No. Civ. 32083PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Plaintiffs, appearing in propria persona,' appeal 1 from an order dismissing their action against respondents after the court sustained respondents’ general and special demurrers to the second amended complaint without leave to amend.
Plaintiffs’ pleadings are difficult to interpret within the established legal framework, and their brief fails to enlighten us as to the nature of the action they have attempted to plead, the material facts, the relief sought, or the assignments of error with respect to the court’s action. (Rules 13 and 15, California Rules of Court.) As a general rule, it is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tarmann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Golden v. DunganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- DeMello v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.