Legal Opinion
Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense of the U.S.A.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 30, 1982No. 81-2285PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Circuit Judge:
In October 1977 the United States Navy granted a contract to Consolidated Airborne Systems, Inc. (CAS), for the procurement of certain fuel quantity test sets and data. Following several attempts to obtain administrative relief, appellant, Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. (Gull), the second low bidder on the contract, filed suit in federal district court, alleging that both the Navy’s award and its administration of the contract were illegal and asking that further performance be enjoined. The district court dismissed the case, finding that Gull had standing to protest the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Edward Spannaus v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- In Re Auto-Train Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- National Wildlife Federation v. Robert F. Burford, Mountain States Legal Foundation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.