Legal Opinion
Angarano v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1974No. 7006, 7140, 7168, 7312 and 7435PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Associate Judge,
with whom REILLY, Chief Judge, NEBEKER and YEAGLEY, Associate Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired, concur:
Reconsideration en banc has been sought of the decision of the division of the court *455in these cases (which have not been consolidated but which have been considered together for the convenience of the court and the parties). Angarano v. United States, D.C.App., 312 A.2d 295 (1973). The motion is denied. In light of the dissenting views expressed by our brothers Gallagher and Kern, the position of the majority should be stated briefly with respect to three…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) PhotographsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roosevelt Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Shepard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. BellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.