Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1990No. 88-356PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

The trial court denied without a hearing appellant’s motion, pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 (1989), 1 to vacate his sentence. Appellant argues he was denied effective assistance of counsel in December 1979 when he pleaded guilty to one count of assault with intent to rape, id. § 22-501 (1989), for which he received probation (revoked four years later). Appellant now asserts his innocence and claims he would not have pleaded guilty if counsel had not erroneously informed him that his cousin had made a statement to the police and was prepared to testify against him at…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Roy Edward Raines v. United States of America, Michael Pasterchik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Ready v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Sykes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Lane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API