Legal Opinion

Trunkline Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1957No. 16228_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.

The question here is whether tlie Federal Power Commission, having ordered a full hearing into a phase of a Natural Gas Company’s rate, can ignore the Examiner’s findings favorable to the Company and adverse to the Staff’s contention by retrospectively limiting the issues. We hold that any such action is an abuse of the administrative process and that the Commission may not do it.

Because Trunkline Gas Company (Trunkline) is owned by its largest customer, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle), to whom it sells 98% of its gas, the tariff rate filed and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Corp. Commission of Kan. v. Federal Power Commission. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. National Rag & Waste Company, Inc., and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Narragansett Electric Company v. KennellySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958
  2. Government of Guam v. Federal Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. The Government Of Guam v. Federal Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Pacific Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Power Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, NerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Pacific Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Power Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, NerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API