Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pacific Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Power Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Ner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 2, 1976No. 74-2046Published

1DissentBazelon, Chief Judge

There is a certain attractiveness, I must admit, to the FPC’s decision in this case; after all, the Commission simply has required petitioner PGT to do what most other gas companies must do before increasing their rates: give the FPC thirty days notice of the proposed increase so that the Commission can perform its statutory mandate to assure that the rates are “just and reasonable.” But an appealing decision is not a reasoned decision, one which explains the basis for reaching the two necessary legal conclusions to support amendment of a tariff: (1) an existing condition has become “unjust,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Public Service Commission v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. American Louisiana Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  5. Trunkline Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API