Legal Opinion
Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 21, 1953No. 10791_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This is the relevant history of the administrative action of the Federal Power Commission which we are asked to review in these cases. The starting point is an order of July 2, 1948, by which the Commission granted Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company, hereinafter designated as the petitioner or the Company, a certificate of public convenience and necessity under Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, 56 Stat. 84 (1942), 15 U.S.C.A. § 717f(c), authorizing it to build and operate certain extensions of a natural gas pipe line system on condition that a tariff satisfactory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by36 opinions
- City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State Corp. Commission of Kan. v. Federal Power Commission. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Boston Edison Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Intermountain Gas Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.