Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 26, 2000No. 44597-9-IPublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Becker, A.C.J.

This decision reverses in part an order dismissing, on summary judgment, Sharon Anderson’s suit against State Farm for bad faith and Consumer Protection Act violations. The suit arose from State Farm’s failure to advise Anderson of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage, and its handling of her UIM claim once she made it. We hold, as a matter of law, that an insurer commits bad faith and engages in an unfair claims settlement practice when it fails to disclose the existence of UIM coverage to an injured insured whose damages are substantial and whose account of the accident…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cedell v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Anderson v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Sharbono v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API