Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ham v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 12, 1936No. 174PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Gasguet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369; Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Gasquet v. LapeyreSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co. v. Washington Ex Rel. LinhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moore v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Department of Revenue & Taxation v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Stolldorf v. StolldorfWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Grindstone Butte Project, a Tenancy in Common v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Casebeer v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API