Legal Opinion

Boteilho v. Boteilho

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1977No. 5780PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MENOR, J.

This action is in the nature of a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement to convey real and personal property to the plaintiff. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment in favor of the defendants.

The plaintiff-appellant, Walter Boteilho, is the son of Janet Boteilho, one of the defendant-appellees herein. The other defendant-appellees are Edward Boteilho, Alfred Boteilho, and Nelson Boteilho, brothers of the appellant and sons of Janet Boteilho.

We address ourselves to two principal issues in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shults v. ShultsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Francone v. McClayHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Porter v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. Hewahewa v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Coelho v. FernandezHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Pedrina v. Han Kuk ChunDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API