In re the Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of Brittain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
By writ of certiorari, relator appeals from the decision of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) denying him line-of-duty disability benefits payable under Minn.Stat. § 353.656, subd. 1 (2004). PERA interpreted the statute to provide line-of-duty benefits only when the injury, sickness, or disability was incurred during a hazardous situation.
Because the statute provides line-of-duty benefits to a person injured during “any act of duty,” without limitation to hazardous situations, we reverse.
FACTS
Relator Stephen Brittain had been a Ramsey County Deputy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Trettenero v. Police Pension Fund of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Matter of HildebrandtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mountain Cement Co. v. South of Laramie Water & Sewer DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re BrittainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In re Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006