Legal Opinion
In Re Brittain
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 7, 2006No. A04-2407Published
1Opinion of the Court
724 N.W.2d 512 (2006)
In the Matter of the Application for PERA POLICE AND FIRE PLAN LINE OF DUTY DISABILITY BENEFITS OF Stephen BRITTAIN.
No. A04-2407.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
December 7, 2006.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, Jon K. Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for Petitioner.
Denise Yegge Tataryn, Charles A. Horowitz, Jean B. Roth, Mansfield, Tanick & Cohen, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.
Susan L. Naughton, League of MN Cities, Saint Paul, MN, Cort C. Holten, Jeffrey D. Bores, Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A., Minneapolis, MN,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Robbins v. Board of Trustees of the Carbondale Police Pension FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.