Legal Opinion

In Re Brittain

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 2005No. A04-2407Published

1Opinion of the Court

705 N.W.2d 576 (2005)

In the Matter of the Application for PERA Police and Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of Stephen BRITTAIN.

No. A04-2407.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 15, 2005.

Denise Yegge, Charles A. Horowitz; Mansfield, Tanick & Cohen, Minneapolis, MN, for relator Stephen Brittain.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Jon K. Murphy, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorneys General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent Public Employees Retirement Association.

Considered and decided by DIETZEN, Presiding Judge, KLAPHAKE, Judge, and PETERSON, Judge.

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

By writ of certiorari,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Trettenero v. Police Pension Fund of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API