Legal Opinion

BOLINDERS COMPANY v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1957No. 65-56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff herein claims that it failed to receive the full amount to which it was entitled under an amendment to a contract for the supply of 228 diesel power units to the United States Army. It also claims that defendant arbitrarily denied a second application for a price increase under the same contract.

Plaintiff represented to the Secretary of the Army that it was losing money on its contract, and that it would have to default, unless the contract price was increased. Under the authority of section 201 of Title II of the First War Powers Act, as amended, 55 Stat. 838, 839,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waxman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Waller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  3. Theobald Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Centaur Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coastal Corporation, Moss Bluff Storage Venture, and New Jersey Strategic Petroleum Reserve v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Evans Reamer & MacHine Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Commonwealth Engineering Co. of Ohio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. O'Brien Dieselectric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Winder Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API