Legal Opinion

Ex parte Walpole

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1890No. 20710PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Petition for writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that the petitioner has been held to answer on a criminal charge before the superior court without reasonable or probable cause.

The petition does not show what the charge is upon which he has been committed, but does allege that there is no evidence whatever taken upon his preliminary examination showing or tending to show that he is guilty of any offense whatever. But this is merely his conclusion, and it may be an erroneous conclusion.

A petition for habeas corpus must be verified, and must allege facts showing an illegal…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wall v. MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. MadarisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Sherin v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API