Legal Opinion

People v. Madaris

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1981No. Docket Nos. 21170, 21666PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.

We have consolidated defendant Madaris’ appeal from a judgment of conviction of violating Penal Code section 12021 (possession of a concealable firearm by one previously convicted of a felony), based upon a jury’s verdict, with his concurrent application for a writ of habeas corpus based upon allegations of constitutionally inadequate representation by trial counsel concerning matters outside the appellate record (see People v. Pope (1979) 23 Cal.3d 412, 426 [152 Cal.Rptr. 732, 590 P.2d 859]).

The Appeal From the Judgment

We find no merit, for the reasons we now…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BarrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. StiltnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Rowland v. ChappellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Williams v. DexterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  5. People v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API