People v. Madaris
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.
We have consolidated defendant Madaris’ appeal from a judgment of conviction of violating Penal Code section 12021 (possession of a concealable firearm by one previously convicted of a felony), based upon a jury’s verdict, with his concurrent application for a writ of habeas corpus based upon allegations of constitutionally inadequate representation by trial counsel concerning matters outside the appellate record (see People v. Pope (1979) 23 Cal.3d 412, 426 [152 Cal.Rptr. 732, 590 P.2d 859]).
The Appeal From the Judgment
We find no merit, for the reasons we now…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. BarrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. StiltnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Rowland v. ChappellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Williams v. DexterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- People v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.