Legal Opinion

Batesel v. Schultz

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1975No. 7493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*554OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

The Batesels, plaintiffs below, have appealed from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of John Schultz, the defendant-respondent. Michael Batesel, through his guardians, had brought the action to recover damages from Schultz for injuries he received in an automobile accident which threw Michael from an automobile driven by Schultz.

At the trial, a number of instructions were given to which appellants object. We need concern ourselves with only one instruction as dispositive of this appeal.

The jury was instructed on the language, scope, and burden of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Laakonen v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brandenstein v. HokeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lightenburger v. GordonNevada Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nevada Power Co. v. Metropolitan Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API