McCrillis v. American Heel Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
If by the contract more than a year was required to perform it, the statute of frauds is a defence. A contract calling for a year of employment not to commence until a time subsequent to the date of the contract must be in writing, and there was evidence tending to show a contract with such a term. And performance in part or in full does not make an unenforceable contract enforceable. Emery v. Smith, 46 N. H. 151; Webster v. Blodgett, 59 N. H. 120; Smith v. Phillips, 69 N. H. 470.
The position that the parties made subsequent oral contracts while the year of service was under way is not well…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. PooleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
- Daley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
- Webster v. BlodgettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
3Cited by6 opinions
- McIntire v. WoodallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Davis v. GrimesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Blanchard v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Solmica of New England, Inc. v. VerreaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Collision Communications, Inc. v. P Nokia Solutions and Networks OYDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.