Legal Opinion

McCrillis v. American Heel Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

If by the contract more than a year was required to perform it, the statute of frauds is a defence. A contract calling for a year of employment not to commence until a time subsequent to the date of the contract must be in writing, and there was evidence tending to show a contract with such a term. And performance in part or in full does not make an unenforceable contract enforceable. Emery v. Smith, 46 N. H. 151; Webster v. Blodgett, 59 N. H. 120; Smith v. Phillips, 69 N. H. 470.

The position that the parties made subsequent oral contracts while the year of service was under way is not well…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. PooleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
  2. Daley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
  4. Webster v. BlodgettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McIntire v. WoodallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Davis v. GrimesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Blanchard v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  4. Solmica of New England, Inc. v. VerreaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Collision Communications, Inc. v. P Nokia Solutions and Networks OYDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API