Legal Opinion
Camille Haddad v. Alexander, Zelmanski, Danner & Fioritto
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 16, 2014No. 13-2026PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Plaintiff Camille Haddad (“Haddad”) appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment to Defendant law firm Alexander, Zelmanski, Danner & Fioretti, PLLC, (“Firm”) in this action brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., and the Michigan Collection Practices Act (“MCPA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.251, et seq. We reverse.
I. Background
Haddad bought a unit in Cumberland Condominiums on May 15, 1991. He lived in the condominium until 2005, and then began renting it out. The Firm represents Cumberland Condominium Association…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- Teri Lynn Hinkle v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Damien Freeman v. Lyneal WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Deborah Walton v. EOS CCACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Carl Ward v. NPAS, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Mabel Samons v. Nat'l Mines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.