Legal Opinion

(PC) Benanti v. Matevousian

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 15, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01556Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL BENANTI, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01556-LJO-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD 13 v. ) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, AND DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR COPY OF ) 14 MATEVOUSIAN, DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT ) 15 Defendants. ) [ECF Nos. 78, 79] ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Michael Benanti is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norman E. Tedder v. Edward Odel, Cpl., James Scott McAlisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API