Legal Opinion

United States v. MacCollom

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1976No. 74-1487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

426 U.S. 317 (1976)

UNITED STATES

v.

MACCOLLOM.

No. 74-1487.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 29, 1976.

Decided June 10, 1976.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Frank H. Easterbrook argued the cause for the United States pro hac vice. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Thornburgh, and Jerome M. Feit.

John A. Strait, by appointment of the Court, 423 U. S. 1045, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

2Judgment of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

This case presents the question of whether the restrictions imposed by 28 U. S. C. § 753 on the…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · Brennan; Dissent · Stevens.

3Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. (PC) Benanti v. MatevousianDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (PC) Ruiz v. LeonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PC) Ruiz v. MobertDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC) Ruiz v. OrozcoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Ruiz v. RossiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API