Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1984No. Appeal, No. 2539 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

Robert Holmes (Holmes) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision finding him to be only partially disabled. We affirm.

Holmes was last employed as a truck mechanic by Pisani Brothers, Inc. (employer). On August 22, 1978, he sustained a work-related injury to his right knee as a result of which he was found totally disabled and awarded workmen’s compensation benefits of $149.89 per week. Thereafter, the employer attempted to involve Holmes in a vocational rehabilitation program but Holmes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Interstate Truck Service, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Cugini v. Workmen's CompenSation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. John F. Davis Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Korol v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Vinglas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Heisey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Bennett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API