Legal Opinion

Blough v. Lochrie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

This action was brought to recover royalties claimed to be due by the defendants under the terms of a lease, and for rental of certain land occupied. The record discloses denial of liability, and a right of set-off insisted upon. A special verdict disposed of the collateral matters, and the only question now requiring consideration relates to royalty payment's. There is no substantial dispute about the facts, and the case turns upon the proper interpretation of the written contract executed October 6, 1916, between the plaintiff and Eeese, who thereafter assigned…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sternbergh v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Greek v. WylieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Advance Industrial Supply Co. v. Eagle Metallic Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Corona Coal & Coke Co. v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Miles v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerard Tookmanian v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Shoemaker's AccountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Greenough v. Colonial Colliery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API