Legal Opinion

Shoemaker's Account

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1923No. Appeal, No. 216PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The owners of adjoining land, underlaid with coal, leased it, in 1876, for purposes of mining, and, at the same time, executed a deed of trust’ to one Shoemaker, who was named as manager for all, and given power to relet when necessary. Four years later, a number of other contiguous holders of property joined in this agreement. The first lease was forfeited in 1888, and a new contract entered into, the rights of the grantees therein being subsequently acquired by the Mt. Lookout Coal Company, which has since conducted the operations. Provision was made for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. FlowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Bittner v. Quemahoning Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. HeirsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. McKeever v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. GAF CORPORATION v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. West Penn Administration, Inc. v. Union National Bank of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Philip Morris Inc. v. Pittsburgh Penguins, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Schofield v. SchofieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API