Legal Opinion

Launtz v. Kinloch Telephone Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 5, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

For ten years prior to August, 1913, appellee maintained its East St. Louis Exchange and offices in a number of rooms rented from appellant. The parties entered into a new lease for the same premises for a period of five years from August 1,1913, at a monthly rental of $222.50. Appellant agreed, inter alia, to light the premises, daily, with electricity from 7 o ’clock a. m. until midnight and for the remainder of the night with gas or electricity. He also agreed to furnish the necessary gas or electric current to charge appellee’s electric machines and fans. The provision of the lease which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Stetler v. North Branch Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Fergen v. LyonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McPike v. LuerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaybill Corp., Inc. v. CherneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Hughes Realty Company v. BreitbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Matter of Heather CompaniesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  4. Hindu Incense Manufacturing Co. v. MacKenzieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API