Legal Opinion

Hindu Incense Manufacturing Co. v. MacKenzie

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 1, 1948No. Gen. No. 44,392PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Feinberg

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in two counts; one for a declaratory judgment, the other for an injunction. An answer was filed to both counts. Plaintiff made its' motion to strike the answer to count 1. Upon a hearing limited to count 1, the answer thereto, and the motion to strike the answer, the court entered a declaratory judgment. No proceedings were had under count 2. Defendant’s motion to vacate the declaratory judgment, to withdraw its answer and to strike plaintiff’s complaint was denied. The appeal is by defendant from the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pettit v. TourisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Stoddard v. Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Fuchs v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Garlick v. ImgruetIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Thomas v. Gottlieb, Bauernschmidt, Straus Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schumacher v. FattenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API