Legal Opinion

McPike v. Luer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

In an action of assumpsit, appellant sought to recover damages for an alleged breach of a written contract and the verdict and judgment were in favor of appellees. The main controversy between the parties dépends upon the proper construction of their contract. For the sake of brevity and perspicuity, we set out only those provisions pertinent to the issues and transpose the fourth and fifth clauses.

“Contract agreement made and entered into this 18th day of October, A. D. 1919, by and between John H. McPike, party of the first part, and August J. Luer, party of the second part, doing business…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abbott v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Columbian Hard Wood Lumber Co. v. LangleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  3. Capitol Food Co. v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Transcon, Inc. v. Motion Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Launtz v. Kinloch Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Bevilauqua v. City of TaylorvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  4. Liese v. HentzeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API