Legal Opinion

Day v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 100, Calendar No. 35,127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a crossing accident case, and the question for review is presented by an order of the trial judge wherein he directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of proofs on the ground that plaintiff’s decedent was guilty of contributory negligence.

The accident involved occurred at the point where defendant’s track crosses West Superior street in the city of Alma, Michigan. This is a paved street extending in an easterly and westerly direction, and defendant’s track at this point extends in a northwesterly and southeasterly direction. Immediately adjacent to defendant’s track and on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amedeo v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lockett v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Bishop v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Rogers v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Day v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Ludwig v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API