Skidmore v. Leavitt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action for specific performance by Nate Skidmore against J. H. Leavitt and others, Objection to the introduction of plaintiff’s evidence sustained, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, C.
In so far as the questions presented on appeal are concerned, this is an action by Nate Skidmore against J. II. Leavitt to enforce the specific performance of a certain contract for the sale of real estate. The contract which is sought to be enforced is dated the 24th day of December, 1907, and provided that the defendant was to procure title to certain lands described in said contract and convey the same to the plaintiff for the sum of $3,000, said sum to be paid by delivery of stock in the Coweta State Bank and $1,500 in money, or-a note for $1,400 signed by P. A. Pox…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stevens v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kee v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Strack v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Foster v. GoldschmidtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- Board of County Commissioners v. Tandler Bros.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnston v. KeeferIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Popp v. MungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Swisher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Talamini v. RosaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Polk v. Unknown Trustees, Successors & Assigns of Three-In-One Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.