Legal Opinion

Linn v. Barkey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1855PublishedCited by 13 opinions

ERROR to the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Bill by Barkey against Limi, for the specific performance of the following condition of a bond:

“ The condition of the above obligation is such: whereas the above bounden Solomon Linn has sold unto Jacob Bar-key a certain lot of land known and particularly described as follows: the east half of the south-west quarter of section number eleven, township number thirty-three north, of range number three east, containing eighty acres, more or less, for 300 dollars, for which the said Barkey has paid the said Linn 200 dollars. Now, if the said Barkey does well and truly pay to the said Linn 100…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leonard v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
  2. Gallion v. M'CaslinIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
  3. Pell v. FarquarIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Dawson v. ShirleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Southard v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Christopher & Tenth Street Railroad v. Twenty-third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Toomey v. Read & GreshamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Christopher St. R. Co. v. . 23d St. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API