Legal Opinion
Christopher St. R. Co. v. . 23d St. R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The essential purpose of this action, as alleged in the complaint, was to reform a contract or lease made by and between the Twenty-third Street Railway Company, The Bleecker Street and Fulton Ferry Railroad Company, and The Christopher and Tenth Street Railroad Company, dated the twentieth day of May, 1884. The plaintiffs sought to have the lease reformed by adding to the reservation therein after the words "Fourteenth street," the words "Between Ninth and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gillespie v. MoonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Murray v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Adams v. . FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Schoonmaker v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Porter v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Barker v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.