Legal Opinion
Ross v. Cornell Steamboat Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 29, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions
On Libel, etc.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
The libel in this action is filed to recover damages to steam dredge No. 2, belonging to libelant, which resulted *167from a collision between it and a tow in charge of the tug Norwich belonging to the respondent. The accident happened on the 19th of May, 1897, at about 11 o’clock in the evening, at a place known as “Mull’s Rock,” in the Hudson river between Coxackie and the state dam at Troy. The libelant had a contract with the United States government for the removal of sand and rock which obstructed navigation at the place above mentioned. He had been engaged iii the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Clarita and the ClaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- The" Virginia Ehrman" and The" Agnese"Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ocean S. S. Co. v. P. Sandford Ross, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- Seabrook v. Raft of Railroad Cross-TiesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1889
- Merchants & Miners Transp. Co. v. New England Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanseatische Reederei Akt. Ges. v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Ross v. Cornell Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906