Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 2012No. 070230679; A138276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Smith, 236 Or App 5, 237 P3d 853 (2010), arguing that our conclusion that defendant’s consent to a search of his person was invalid is erroneous in light of the Supreme Court’s overriding analysis in State v. Ashbaugh, 349 Or 297, 244 P3d 360 (2010) (Ashbaugh II). We agree and grant reconsideration, withdraw our former opinion and disposition, and affirm defendant’s convictions because, in light of Ashbaugh II, the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress.

We take the undisputed facts from our prior opinion.

“D…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. LantzschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. LantzschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. GravesWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. MoatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API