Legal Opinion

Converse v. Zinke

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1979No. 78-462Published

1Opinion of the Court

VAN CISE, Judge.

Defendants appeal a judgment for a balance due on a promissory note entered upon the granting of plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict in defendant’s favor. Plaintiff cross-appeals a judgment on defendants’ counterclaims for breach of warranty. We affirm the judgment on the counterclaim and reverse the judgment on the note.

Plaintiff sold her equipment rental business to defendants in exchange for $10,000 cash and a $26,000 promissory note secured by a financing statement and security agreement. Defendants made no payments on the note, and plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Service Oil Co. v. RhodusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Happy Canyon Inv. v. Title Ins. Co. of Minn.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Mumm v. AdamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Ross v. Arrow Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Mero v. Holly Hudson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API