Legal Opinion

Ross v. Arrow Manufacturing Company

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 11, 1957No. 17816PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

The parties appear in this court in the same order in which they appeared in the trial court, and we will refer to them as plaintiffs and defendant.

Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that they were entitled to receive certain shares in an incentive bonus fund which they had earned as employees of defendant.

Defendant by answer denied that plaintiffs were entitled to receive the monies claimed.

The issues were tried to a jury March 1, 1955. When plaintiffs rested their case defendant moved for dismissal of the action, which motion was denied. Defendant presented evidence, at the conclusion of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Bondanza v. MatteucciNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Jackson v. Mountain Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Mero v. Holly Hudson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Converse v. ZinkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Thorpe v. DURANGO SCH. DIST. NO. 9-RColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Mucci v. Falcon School District 49, El Paso CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Mumm v. AdamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Stupp v. Cone Brothers Contracting CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API