Legal Opinion

Mumm v. Adam

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 11, 1957No. 17709PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

The parties were aligned in the trial cpurt as they are here. Plaintiff brought suit to recover on a note and on a check. A favorable verdict in his behalf on these claims is not contested before this court.

Defendant Adam filed his counterclaim, alleging “that defendant and plaintiff were actively engaged in a partnership business known as ‘La Junta Livestock Commission Company’ from April 1, 1946, until January 17, 1950, that said partners each had a one-half interest in said partnership business.” It was further alleged in the counterclaim that, during the existence of the partnership and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Morris v. RedakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Shaw v. LobeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Laughlin v. HaberfeldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
  3. Laymon v. McCombDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  4. Kline Hotel Partners v. Aircoa Equity Interests, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  5. Boner v. LC Fulenwider, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API