Mumm v. Adam
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz
The parties were aligned in the trial cpurt as they are here. Plaintiff brought suit to recover on a note and on a check. A favorable verdict in his behalf on these claims is not contested before this court.
Defendant Adam filed his counterclaim, alleging “that defendant and plaintiff were actively engaged in a partnership business known as ‘La Junta Livestock Commission Company’ from April 1, 1946, until January 17, 1950, that said partners each had a one-half interest in said partnership business.” It was further alleged in the counterclaim that, during the existence of the partnership and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Morris v. RedakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Shaw v. LobeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Laughlin v. HaberfeldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Laymon v. McCombDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
- Kline Hotel Partners v. Aircoa Equity Interests, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Boner v. LC Fulenwider, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.