Colorado National Bank of Denver, a Corporation v. Alfred O. L. Bohm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, as plaintiff in the trial court, brought suit to recover an amount allegedly due on a promissory note. Appellee, as defendant in said suit, denied the right to recover on the ground that he received no consideration for executing the note.
The trial court, over the objection of appellant, permitted parol evidence to be introduced to establish lack of consideration. Appellant assigns this as error. We see nothing in this case which would take it out of the general rule that lack of consideration may be pleaded and proved in a suit on a promissory note.
In substance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Richardson v. LampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Connell v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Fluor Corp. v. United States ex rel. Mosher Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Bogigian v. BogigianIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fluor Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- HASKINS'ESTATE v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.