Legal Opinion

Fluor Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1969No. 21307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

405 F.2d 823

FLUOR CORPORATION, Ltd., et al., Union Tank Car Company,

Ward Industries Corporation, Appellants and Cross-Appellees,

v.

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. MOSHER STEEL COMPANY,

Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 21307, 21307A, 21307B and 21307C.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 6, 1969, Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1969.

Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes, Phoenix, Ariz., Hull, Terry & Bret Harte, Boyle, Bilby, Thompson & Shoenhair, Tucson, Ariz., Thomas C. McConnell, Chicago, Ill. (argued), Lotterman & Weiser, New York City, for appellants & cross-appellees.

Locke, Purnell, Boren,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wiebe Construction Co. v. School District of MillardNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API