Legal Opinion
In re Dinhofer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 20, 1999PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, Philip J. Dinhofer, was admitted to practice as *327an attorney in the State of New York on June 22, 1983 by the Appellate Division, Second Department. He is also admitted to practice before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. At all times relevant herein, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3 for an order publicly censuring respondent predicated upon similar discipline issued by the United States District…
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rommy Revson, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, Judd Burstein v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In re LowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re SupinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re PuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.