State v. Ziepfel
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Painter, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, George M. Ziepfel, Jr., was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol pursuant to R.C. 4511.19(A)(3), his fourth DUI offense within five years. As part of the mandatory penalties in R.C. 4511.99(A)(4)(a) and (b), the trial court ordered that the motorcycle he was driving at the time of the offense be forfeited. At the forfeiture hearing, appellant testified that he had paid $23,000 for the limited production motorcycle and that he had recently been offered $30,000 for it. In contrast, the maximum fine that could have been imposed for the offense…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James E. BusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. 9638 Chicago HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lawson v. WilkesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Smith, Ct2007-0073 (6-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hillman v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
- State v. BybeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. CastelliniOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.