Pilling v. City of Everett
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered November 23, 1911, upon an agreed statement of facts, dismissing an action in equity.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, a taxpayer of the city of Everett seeks to have the city and its officers enjoined from paying certain warrants, alleged to have been issued for indebtedness of the city which was incurred at a time when its indebtedness was in excess of five per cent of the assessed value of the taxable property within the city. A trial upon the merits resulted in a denial of the relief sought and a dismissal of the action. From this disposition of the cause, the plaintiff has appealed.
After issues were made by the pleadings, an agreed statement of facts was signed and filed by the attorneys…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Farquharson v. YearginWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Hull v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Jones v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Schooley v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Taro v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.