Legal Opinion

Hull v. Ames

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1901No. 3811PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. William E. Richabdsoei, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

These cases were consolidated, and tried together. The town of Cheney is a municipal corporation organized under an act of the territorial legislature approved Hovember 23, 1883, and amended December 23, 1885. The respondents are respectively the treasurer, mayor, and clerk of the municipality. Appellant Hull was the owner of a small warrant issued in August, 1892, which warrant was issued for services performed hy a police officer. Appellant Gladwin was the owner of three city warrants, — one issued for services performed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. County Commissioners v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  3. Duryee v. FriarsWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. In re State to Issue Bonds to Fund IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Rummens v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Gladwin v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API