Legal Opinion

Coddington’s Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 8, 2007No. LD-2005-009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

On December 8, 2005, the Supreme Court Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) filed a petition recommending that we suspend the respondent, Paul F. Coddington, Jr., from the practice of law in New Hampshire for two years. Because the respondent did not answer the petition, its allegations were deemed admitted. SUP. Ct. R. 37(16)(c). On March 28, 2006, we ordered the respondent to show cause why he should not be disbarred for his violations of the rules of professional conduct. The respondent did not file a response to the show cause order and, on October 31,2006, he was disbarred.

The respondent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eshleman's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Richmond's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Wolterbeek's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Morgan's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Woiccak's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coffey’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. Bosse’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Grew’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Conner’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Douglas' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API