Legal Opinion

Ghee v. Artuz

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 7, 2003No. 1:97-cv-02191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

BLOCK, District Judge.

Respondent Christopher Artuz (“Artuz”) has moved to disqualify petitioner Dennis Ghee’s (“Ghee”) Court-appointed counsel, Helene Landau, Esq. (“Landau”) based on her having recently served as the Court’s law clerk. The motion is denied; however, the Court adopts a prospective rule that it will disqualify former law clerks from appearing before it for one year after they have completed their clerkship.

I

The procedural and factual posture of the underlying litigation is largely irrelevant to the resolution of the motion. In short, Ghee is seeking a writ of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leland Patzner v. Joyce Burkett A/K/A Joyce McLaughlin Deborah Myerchin and Stutsman County, North Dakota, a Political SubdivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Maurice Carl Gitten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Kenneth Paul HollisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Smith v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
  5. Bumpus v. Uniroyal Tire Co. Division of Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Toliver v. New York City Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. In re Estate of San NicolasSuperior Court of Guam · 2013
  3. In re Estate of San NicolasSuperior Court of Guam · 2013
  4. People v. SablanSuperior Court of Guam · 2023
  5. People v. San AugustinSuperior Court of Guam · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API