Ghee v. Artuz
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BLOCK, District Judge.
Respondent Christopher Artuz (“Artuz”) has moved to disqualify petitioner Dennis Ghee’s (“Ghee”) Court-appointed counsel, Helene Landau, Esq. (“Landau”) based on her having recently served as the Court’s law clerk. The motion is denied; however, the Court adopts a prospective rule that it will disqualify former law clerks from appearing before it for one year after they have completed their clerkship.
I
The procedural and factual posture of the underlying litigation is largely irrelevant to the resolution of the motion. In short, Ghee is seeking a writ of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leland Patzner v. Joyce Burkett A/K/A Joyce McLaughlin Deborah Myerchin and Stutsman County, North Dakota, a Political SubdivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Maurice Carl Gitten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Kenneth Paul HollisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Smith v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
- Bumpus v. Uniroyal Tire Co. Division of Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Toliver v. New York City Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re Estate of San NicolasSuperior Court of Guam · 2013
- In re Estate of San NicolasSuperior Court of Guam · 2013
- People v. SablanSuperior Court of Guam · 2023
- People v. San AugustinSuperior Court of Guam · 2023