People Ex Rel. State Park Commission v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBalthis, J.
Both plaintiff and defendants appeal from a judgment in a condemnation proceeding after a trial by jury which fixed the value of defendants’ property to be acquired by plaintiff.
Plaintiff alleges three errors were committed by the trial court which were prejudicial to the state. The issues raised are:
1. Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in allowing an architect-consultant to state the value of the subject property based on his feasibility study?
2. Did the admission of the sales of other properties, alleged to be noneomparable, constitute prejudicial error?
715
3. Did the trial court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Holtz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.