Legal Opinion

State v. Houston

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 2004No. A04-324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge. *

In December 2003, this court affirmed the conviction and sentence of appellant Gerald Houston for attempted controlled substance crime in the first degree, methamphetamine manufacture, and one count of controlled substance crime in the fifth degree, possession. State v. Houston, No. C5-02-584, 2002 WL 31892561, *6 (Minn.App. Dec.31, 2002). In a subsequent post-conviction proceeding, appellant asserts, inter alia, that the cause of the upward durational departure must be scrutinized under Blakely. Because Blakely does not have retroactive effect in the case and because…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Vickla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API