Legal Opinion

Hudnall v. Pennington & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1925No. 19083. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— In the spring of 1921, a large number of farmers in the vicinity of Kennewick and Richland,' engaged in growing strawberries, asparagus and early potatoes, entered into articles of agreement for the purpose of marketing their products. By the terms of the articles, a committee of five was appointed to represent the association. Pursuant to the powers conferred, the committee entered into a contract with Pennington & Company, a corporation (hereinafter called the company), as sales agent for the products. The contract provided that the company should furnish a surety bond conditioned that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parks v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McCord v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Modern Irrigation & Land Co. v. NeelyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Sweeney v. Lewis Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Canessa v. Kislak, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Shaw v. Calgon, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. State v. PapitsasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API